// assert that we are on position where the NAL unit starts (0x00000001) u_int8_t *data = new u_int8_t[NAL_MAX_SIZE]; int n = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) data[n++] = get1Byte();while (next4Bytes != 0x00000001) { data[n++] = get1Byte(); next4Bytes = test4Bytes(); } Then I analyse it with one function: st_svcext_preview_info_t preview_info; st_svcext_preview(handle, reinterpret_cast<char *>(data), &preview_info); And only then, depending on the "preview_info.action" I can decide if the current NAL unit should be skipped or not. As I understood, if the current NAL block should be skipped and I call SkipBytes(n) - than the next n bytes will be skipped ? Or not ?
No. Because (in your code) you've already read the entire NAL unit (via the calls to "get1Byte()"), you don't call "skipBytes()" at all. Instead, just continue and read/analyze the next NAL unit.
-- Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/ _______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
