On Thursday 16 April 2009, 09:41:53, Stas Desyatnlkov wrote: > [...] But on both systems it > consumes too much of the CPU. I tried using live555 for the reception of > 100 audio streams (g.711). It consumed about 10% CPU on my 3Ghz machine. I > end up rewriting it with a simple set of asynchronous sockets, the CPU > consumption fell to 1% at peak levels on both Linux and Windows.
Would you please share also some of your code? If the performance improvements are so radical, why do not try to have those improvements merged back in live555 official releases? -- ESC:wq -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
