Hi Deb, text has been added and we are now to revision -18: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-geo-18
Can you check whether all of your concerns are addressed? Thanks L. > On 13 Jun 2025, at 19:03, Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote: > > The text Luigi proposes ('this document....) is fine. TY. > > Deb > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dino Farinacci <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> > 1. As for RFC2026: The "Experimental" designation typically denotes a >> > specification that >> > is part of some research or development effort. >> > >> > This document is part of a development effort to include geo-coordinates >> > in LISP. Is not part of an “experiment", as not all experimental RFC are >> > necessarily part of an experiment. It is about the maturity level of the >> > technology. >> >> If Deb is okay with this text, I will add to document. >> >> > 2. The history of LISP. >> > >> > Long story short, LISP was born as a big experiment and the WG chartered >> > only to produce informational and experimental documents. With the >> > deployment experience gathered through the years, the LISP WG has >> > rechartered to move the most mature pieces of LISP to STD Track, but not >> > all the pieces. >> >> This is informational for Deb. And I think everyone agrees something like >> this shouldn't go in this specific document. Otherwise it would need to go >> in every LISP document. Please ack or nak this Deb and other reviewers. >> >> Dino >>
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
