Thanks for your additional comments Med. See responses inline.

> Hi Dino, 
> 
> I'm fully supportive of the consistency argument (this is actually a reason 
> of my second DISCUSS point :-)). However, I'm still not comfortable to 
> include claims such the one raised in my ballot for the simple reason that we 
> don't have any IETF-endorsed solution. I don't think maintaining this claim 
> adds much, but if you prefer cite these expired drafts, you may reword, e.g.,
> 
> DELETE this part from the abstract:
> 
>   which is compatible with the Global Positioning
>   Satellite (GPS) encodings used by other routing protocols.

Done.

> + make this change
> 
> OLD:
>   This document defines a new LCAF encoding for Geo-Coordinates, which
>   is compatible with the one used in other routing protocols, namely
>   OSPF [I-D.acee-ospf-geo-location], IS-IS
>   [I-D.shen-isis-geo-coordinates], and BGP
>   [I-D.chen-idr-geo-coordinates] protocols
> 
> NEW:
>   This document defines a new LCAF encoding for Geo-Coordinates, which
>   is compatible with the one proposed for other routing protocols, namely
>   OSPF [I-D.acee-ospf-geo-location], IS-IS
>   [I-D.shen-isis-geo-coordinates], and BGP
>   [I-D.chen-idr-geo-coordinates] protocols.
> 
> + DELETE this part:
> 
>   The encoding format is consistent with the encoding used in other
>   routing protocols, namely OSPF [I-D.acee-ospf-geo-location], IS-IS
>   [I-D.shen-isis-geo-coordinates], and BGP
>   [I-D.chen-idr-geo-coordinates].

Done. Made all your changes. Look for -16 with udpates.

Dino

> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Dino Farinacci <[email protected]>
>> Envoyé : lundi 26 mai 2025 22:49
>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email protected]>
>> Cc : The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; lisp-
>> [email protected]; [email protected]; Kiran Makhijani
>> <[email protected]>
>> Objet : Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-geo-14:
>> (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
>> 
>> 
>>>> commit why or why not the working groups have expired the
>> drafts.
>>>> But the intent still stands and I don't want to remove the
>>>> references.
>>> 
>>> [Med] My concern is more about this claim:
>>> 
>>> "which is compatible with the Global Positioning Satellite (GPS)
>>> encodings used by other routing protocols"
>> 
>> And is true if implmentations used the draft. Its a specific
>> working group issue. And if the working groups decide this is a
>> needed feature, then they will resurect the drafts.
>> 
>> Its better to document, that we were in coorindation versus
>> designing in silos.
>> 
>> Dino
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to