Well yes you have over the years, many times. Just not within this new period. But that doesn’t mean the previous support has vanished. Maybe those people aren’t participating in the IETF anymore.
I suggest the chairs look at the WG email archives. Dino > On Feb 25, 2025, at 4:32 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > silence IS NTO consensus and insofar we did not receive feedback on this > document. > > We extend the last call period for one more week, until 5th March. > > Please express your opinion on whether or not this document is ready to be > published. > > Thanks > > Luigi & Padma > > > >> On 12 Feb 2025, at 10:14, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear WG >> >> This message starts a two-week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-geo ending >> on February 26th 2025. >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-geo/ >> >> This document describes how Geo-Coordinates can be used in the LISP >> Architecture and Protocols. The functionality proposes a new LISP >> Canonical Address Format (LCAF) encoding for such Geo-Coordinates, >> which is compatible with the Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) >> encodings used by other routing protocols. >> >> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is >> ready to be handed over to the AD. If you have objections, please state your >> reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns. >> >> Note: silence IS NOT consensus. >> >> Thanks >> >> Padma and Luigi > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
