I agree that it is ready to be handed over to AD. Thanks Balaji
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:55:32 -0800 From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-te-20 To: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]>, [email protected] Message-ID: <cag-cqxqrbvl3em37ppqdjjd3w35gakxgrpov06-ysfdwjhg...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f5b064062afe3f91" Dear WG This message starts a two-week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-te ending on January 20th 2025. An IPR call has been issued to the authors and the lisp wg. >From the Abstract: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-te/20/ This document describes how LISP re-encapsulating tunnels can be used for Traffic Engineering purposes. The mechanisms described in this document require no LISP protocol changes but do introduce a new locator (RLOC) encoding. The Traffic Engineering features provided by these LISP mechanisms can span intra-domain, inter-domain, or combination of both. Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready to be handed over to the AD. If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns. Note: silence IS NOT consensus. Thanks Padma and Luigi -------------- next part -------------- A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ... Name: not available Type: text/html Size: 2486 bytes Desc: not available ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:26:03 -0800 From: Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> Subject: [lisp] Re: IPR Call for draft-ietf-lisp-te-20 To: Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Kowal <[email protected]>, Parantap Lahiri <[email protected]>, LISP mailing list list <[email protected]>, [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I am unaware of any IPR that relates to this draft. Dino > On Jan 5, 2025, at 3:25 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Authors, Contributors and LISP WG > > This email initiates an IPR call for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-te/20/. > > If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, please > reply to this email and cc the WG regardless of whether or not you are > personally aware of any relevant IPR. Please confirm explicitly if there is > an IPR and whether it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > If you are on the LISP WG email list but are not an author or listed > contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a > voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79. > > Thanks > Padma and Luigi ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:04:15 -0800 From: Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> Subject: [lisp] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-te-20 To: Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> Cc: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]>, [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I think it is ready. Dino > On Jan 5, 2025, at 3:55 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear WG > > This message starts a two-week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-te ending on > January 20th 2025. > An IPR call has been issued to the authors and the lisp wg. > > From the Abstract: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-te/20/ > > This document describes how LISP re-encapsulating tunnels can be used > for Traffic Engineering purposes. The mechanisms described in this > document require no LISP protocol changes but do introduce a new > locator (RLOC) encoding. The Traffic Engineering features provided > by these LISP mechanisms can span intra-domain, inter-domain, or > combination of both. > > Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is > ready to be handed over to the AD. If you have objections, please state your > reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns. > > Note: silence IS NOT consensus. > > Thanks > > Padma and Luigi > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] ------------------------------ End of lisp Digest, Vol 193, Issue 5 ************************************
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
