Thanks Acee for your useful comments. I created draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-09 and it is on the queue for when submission window opens up.
> On Jul 9, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > > Major Issues: None > > Minor Issues: > > I have the following minor comments. > > 1. In section 3, could you more precisely define the places where > the new encoding is used? I guess in any LISP message where an > EID or RLOC is specified? It is listed in section 3 where we say all messages that contain EID-records and RLOC-records can use the name-encoding AFI. > 2. In section 5, the final sentence fragment didn't parse and it > wasn't obvious to me how to edit it - "As well as identifying > the router name...". Fixed. Thanks. > 3. In section 9.2, The description of the onboarding process includes > very specific details that aren't fully explained. Would it be > possible to describe the use case at a higher level? This is some text from the cisco guys. I don't know how to change that. They have the intellectual property on it. > 4. Remove change log prior to publication. Ack. > Nits: > > I've attached some editorial suggestions. Applied all your suggestions, modulo RTRs are "Re-encapsualting Tunnel Routers" but they are reliable too LOL. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
