HI Dino
Thanks for the updates. From draft-ietf-lisp-te
Otherwise, when the S-bit is set and an
xTR determines the RLOC is not reachable, it must not use any of
the remaining entries in the ELP list and drop the packet.
Shouldn't this be a "MUST not"?
Otherwise all my comments have been addressed.
Padma
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 3:16 PM Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here is where i wonder whether strict would have been best to drop the
> packet and not go to n+1 per the example for SFC where there are mandatory
> services.
> >
> > I think it might be worthwhile to document this behavior so as there are
> no surprises.
> > Thoughts?
>
> Will add. Thanks.
>
> Dino
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
