It was clearly showed in my first review. I sent you the xml with the modified text.
Ciao L. > On 2 May 2024, at 18:25, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please provide text and tell me where you prefer the paragraph starting with > "This document proposes …" to go. > > Dino > >> On May 2, 2024, at 6:07 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dino, >> >> You missed the important part, the fact that the document updates 8060 and >> deprecates types 5. >> The current text still say that the format is specified in 8060, which is >> not the case anymore. >> Here is the suggested text again: >> >> This document proposes a new LCAF encoding for geo-coordinates, which is >> compatible with the one used in other >> routing protocols, namely OSPF [I-D.acee-ospf-geo-location], IS-IS >> [I-D.shen-isis-geo-coordinates], >> and BGP [I-D.chen-idr-geo-coordinates]. This document updates [RFC8060]. In >> particular, the use of geo-coordinates >> encoding defined in Section 4.3 of [RFC8060] and identified by LCAF type 5 >> is deprecated. >> >> >> Two additional points: >> >> 1. The abstract must be updated. You are now proposing a new format. You >> also need to state “This document updates RFC 8060”. >> >> 2. Section 5: Type 17 is suggested, not requested. >> >> >> Ciao >> >> L. >> >> >>> On 30 Apr 2024, at 18:31, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I didn't and believe it doesn't need to go at the beginning of the document. >>> >>> Dino >>> >>>> On Apr 30, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 30 Apr 2024, at 17:41, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'll make all your chnages but this one comment: >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 30, 2024, at 7:58 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> routing protocols, namely OSPF [I-D.acee-ospf-geo-location], IS-IS >>>>>> [I-D.shen-isis-geo-coordinates], >>>>> >>>>> It is not true. Only the GPS encoding is the same. The general encoding >>>>> that wraps the GPS encoding is LCAF. You do not want to mislead that OSPF >>>>> and ISIS use LCAF. >>>> >>>> Agreed. You can add exactly this details. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Luigi >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dino >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
