Thanks Alvaro!
Best regards, Dave Fusik ____________________________________________________ Solutions Engineer | CISCO – U.S. Federal Defense Sales CCDE #2013::70 | CCIE #4768: Enterprise Infrastructure and Security Office: 919-392-3701 | Cell: 919-637-1058 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 9:59 AM To: Dave Fusik (dfusik) <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lisp] RFCs 9300, 9301, 9301 Hi Dave! It is not a matter of when, but if. Note that not all widely-deployed protocols are Internet Standards — BGP is a good example. The WG may decide to take on the task to change the status, which usually requires a revised RFC. Take a look at rfc6410 [1] for the requirements/process. HTH, Alvaro. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6410#autoid-4 On April 15, 2024 at 8:00:13 AM, Dave Fusik (dfusik) ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: To whom it may concern, Sorry to bother you. I see that the above RFCs have a status of "Proposed Standard" and I'm wondering if you can provide any insight on when these will progress to "Internet Standard". Thanks for any information you can provide. Best regards, Dave Fusik ____________________________________________________ Solutions Engineer | CISCO – U.S. Federal Defense Sales CCDE #2013::70 | CCIE #4768: Enterprise Infrastructure and Security Office: 919-392-3701 | Cell: 919-637-1058 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
