The draft indicates QUIC can be used as a reliable transport. But are you saying QUIC should be used for all LISP messages?
Dino > On Apr 22, 2022, at 6:35 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > May I ask for reasons not to use QUIC instead of home made UDP based > transport followed by TCP ? > > Many thx, > Robert > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 9:42 AM Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > During the last LISP WG meeting in Vienna/Meetecho the authors of the draft: > > LISP Map Server Reliable Transport > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kouvelas-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport/ > > Asked for adoption as WG document. > Call for adoption during the meeting showed clear consensus. > This email is the usual procedure to confirm the consensus on the mailing > list. > > If anybody has concerns about adopting this document please state so on the > mailing list before May 5th 2022. > Please also argument the technical reason why you have concerns. > > Ciao > > Luigi & Joel > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
