Hi Dino, Marc,
Yes, we considered adding an IID. However, since this means changing the
WG kernel code, we discarded this option in favor of a user-space
solution. I agree that it would be a nice addition though :)
From an implementation perspective I don't think it's straightforward
to do LISP in WG encapsulation without substantial processing overhead.
Right now we're programming the WG interface, but if we want LISP in WG
we probably need handling packets in user space also.
Thanks,
Jordi
El 24/3/20 a les 10:32, Dino Farinacci ha escrit:
Do you mean using lisp encapsulation as part of the encrypted payload? Or as an
alternative to the wireguard header?
The former.
The wireguard whitepaper seems to establish the dataplane header very
specifically, but since it seems to assume that the payload is an ip packet, a
lisp packet could work there.
Thanks,
Marc
Right.
Dino
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
