The last diff I can find in my email from you (which may not be the last
diff) still has the text that "Documents that request for a new LISP
packet type MAY indicate a prefrred value in section 10.4."
What Luigi had suggested was:
Documents that request for a new LISP packet type MAY indicate
a preferred value.
That fix works for me. Leaving it saying something about section 10.4
is incorrect.
And while it is useful to understand how mistakes were made in order to
avoid repeating them, I am not going to agonize over how we missed this
broken language.
Yours,
Joel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
