Josh Boyer wrote:
> simpleboot is in Linus' tree now. It went in with the first pull
> request paulus sent for .26.
>
I got it, now to figure it out.
> I don't understand that comment anyway though. If you're working with a
> PowerPC board, why aren't you using the powerpc tree (paulus') to begin
> with? "Backporting" pieces of it to some other tree seems to be a waste
> of time to me...
>
I am updating a port I did in 2005 ? based on the ml403 port that
was in at that time.
But it is an independent BSP. I need to move it to the current
powerpc/devicetree,
but I have to do so without breaking alot of things we have have
working for years.
At the moment I am somewhat "surely" about a number of the issues
related to the powerpc/devicetree migration.
Aside from the BSP issues, this breaks my boot monitor, and is going
to require adding alot more code than I can either justify
or see as necescary because there are some aspects of how the
devicetree/powerpc stuff is architected that
politely I think are brain dead.
But I will get over it - probably. There just may be a bit of
cursing and foul language before things work.
--
Dave Lynch Pico Computing, Inc.
Software Development Embedded Linux
717.627.3770 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.picocomputing.com
fax: 1.253.369.9244 Cell: 1.717.587.7774
Tiny Mighty Machines
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
