On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:24:24AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: [snip] > what follows is (for ... what ... the third time?), an attempt to > just extend the smc_uart struct in commproc.h to add a relocation > pointer. there's no reason i can think of why this shouldn't be > applied.
Is this the same patch / idea that I've seen both Wolfgang and Dan have a number of comments on, or something different? If it is the same, have their issues been cleared in this version of the patch? Thanks. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
