Am Mo, den 19.07.2004 schrieb Tom Rini um 20:20: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 18:32, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Second, this takes us in the direction of 82xx. Until the 82xx > > > abstractions get flushed out a bit more, I remain unconvinced that > > > they're really the right way to go (perhaps hooking the other direction > > > would work better, e.g. platform_init() calls board_init(), with a weak > > > version provided, and some functions forced to be provided by board.c, > > > such as m8xx_map_io). > > > > I chose this way because it seemed to be a simple way to port the dbox2 > > board to 2.6 using the new device API. Is there another 8xx board which > > uses the device API for its onboard peripherials and can be used as a > > reference? Can I get my devices registered without modifying > > platform_init, or shall I send a patch with the board_init() you > > mentioned? See my board.c attached. > > There currently isn't a reference platform for what you speak of. My > preference would be to see what I described given a shot to see if it > looks better or worse (and it better, or worse, in the flow of things).
How about this patch? Regards, Andreas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: board_init.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 843 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20040723/5aca346d/attachment.bin
