On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:15:15PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 05:08:22PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > that's a problem with m8xx_cpm_hostalloc() (or how you are using it) if > > it doesn't keep around the values you need. > > > > Yes and no, someone changed the m8xx_cpm_hostalloc() implementation and now > it does not behave as it used to. Earlier both __pa(adr) and __va(__pa(adr)) > worked on addresses returned by m8xx_cpm_hostalloc(). > > I think in it's current form it's useless and should either be changed back > to what > it was or die.
The 8xx-specific stuff is clearly Dan's area...I was just commenting on your generic concerns about consistent_*. Regards, -- Matt Porter porter at cox.net This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
