Dnia 2005-11-21 12:43, U?ytkownik David Jander napisa?: >On Monday 21 November 2005 08:44, Wojciech Kromer wrote: > > >>My system is: >> - 2.4.25 kernel from denx.de >> - uclibc (gcc 3.4.2) + busybox >> - changed HZ to 1000 >> - rebuild kernel only >> >>AFAIR there souldn't be any need to recompile user apps. >> >> > >Just an uneducated guess, but are you sure uclibc doesn't depend on HZ at all? >Some things might be just straight syscalls, others might be implemented in >userspace (inside uclibc)... for example alarm(1) programming an alarm on >jiffies+1/HZ, and HZ being compiled in from kernel headers ? >I may just be talking rubbish though. > >
Hmm, after recompiling whole uclibc stuff it seem to work same. There should be kernel problem. Sleep & select works fine, but alarm works 10 times faster. Anyone tries to change HZ to 1000?
