I would assume you plan on moving your driver over to the driver model which will make all of this moot.
So I think Sylvain's suggestion of allocating a number for the time being makes the most sense until we get 52xx convert over to platform devices. - kumar On Mar 10, 2005, at 12:57 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote: > Sylvain Munaut wrote: > > > >> Sylvain, but what I wish now - only single number > >> (until driver will done). > > > > If you only need a temporary ocp ID, just fix it youself in your > local > > tree, no need to try to push that upstream. > > I already use it as temp, but I don't want pitfalls in future (when > smb. take this number). > > Also, since CAN ocp present not only in MPC5200, but, AFAIK, in another > chips too, IMHO, it must be well known constant id. > > Regards > Andrey
