On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote: > Tom, > > >>>>So which is the BK tree to use: > >>>>linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ??? > > > >Aside from possible changes to match upstream subsystem rewrites (such > >as IDE) there hasn't been any changes in linuxppc-2.4 specific to 8xx > >that didn't happen in 2_4_devel. > > > >>http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml calls linuxppc_2_4_devel the > >>"old PPC development tree" !? > > > >That's correct. It's becoming more of a pain to maintain or own set of > >trees to track 2.4 when Marcelo uses BK as well. > > I suppose we need both trees. Otherwise you would have got rid of one. > Right? :o)
With an infinite amount of time, there would be only one tree. Patches to move things, one at a time, in logical chunks, to linux-2.4 happily reviewed. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
