On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 10:10:22AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 10:12:15AM +0000, Mark Powell wrote: > > > > Davey wrote: > > > > >Some time ago Stefan and I had reported that both ethernet interfaces > > >cannot work well together. Sorry I have lost all old mails when I > > >reinstall my computer. We have find that this problem is caused by > > >that the base address of eht1 is wrong set. Follow by my patch for > > >linux-2.4.22 and linux-2.4.23. I have test the patch and it work well. > > > > shouldn't that just be: > > This is the right way to do it, we can't put that other hack in the > kernel. If somebody verifies this patch hen we can get it in. >
Matt, I checked old-OCP version of ibm405ep.c and indeed it had EMAC1_BASE there. Obviously this is a typo introduced during conversion to new OCP. I checked these definitions when Stefan first reported the problem but failed to notice this :-(. Eugene. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
