Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
| We have been surprised, that CONFIG_PIN_TLB was able to reduce the page | miss rate already by approx. 40%. We are also working on the | optimization/tuning of our application and likely there we can gain more | than by further squeezing the TBL management of the Linux kernel, I agree. I noticed a possible improvement in performance however have not yet done a set of tests to back this up. I saw the huge TLB stuff in 2.6.0-test11 and nearly fell off my chair - can someone here provide some reference to read on this so I can be more useful talking about it? Jon. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
