Dear Jocke, sorry for the late reply.
In message <BCEFJBPJCGFCNMMMIDBHOEPBCJAA.Joakim.Tjernlund at lumentis.se> you wrote: > > Had a look at your CPU15 errata workaround for 8xx and I have a comment > or two: > > 1) I think you should make the sysctl support a compile time option > as the overhead for sysctl support in the TLB handler is 6 instr. when > the fix itself is only 4 instr. You are right. > 2) You placed the workaround in the middle of the CPU6 workaround which will > disable the CPU6 workaround(I think). Move it before the #ifdef > CONFIG_8xx_CPU6 > and you should be fine. You are right again - we fixed this in our CVS tree now. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- See us @ Embedded World, Nuremberg, Feb 22 - 24, Hall 10.0 Booth 310 Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de The management question ... is not _whether_ to build a pilot system and throw it away. You _will_ do that. The only question is whether to plan in advance to build a throwaway, or to promise to deliver the throwaway to customers. - Fred Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month"
