David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: > Wolfgang Reissnegger wrote: >> Hi Andrei, David, >> >> It's great to hear that Andrei's git tree is active again. >> >> As you might have heard, Xilinx is in the process of setting up a git >> tree as well. Right now we are waiting for the new hosting machines to >> be installed. We should get those machines up and running shortly >> (within a couple weeks). >> > Absolutely fantastic - however I think kernel.org would be happy to host > your git tree for you > as well as a few other places. Those are locations people would look for > public git trees. > I beleive you can still excecise some control. I beleive they are free - > though I suspect kernel.org would not > mind contributions from xilinx.
I agree, and I already requested kernel.org site hosting a while back, but I did not get a response yet. [snip] > For me the most significant issue is the bazillion layers of nested > macro's and includes. I don't see the macros as an issue, just look at the implementation of, for example, spin_lock_irq() and Xilinx's macros seem like child's play :-) As for includes, yes, there are a few too many header files. But, as time progresses and the need arises they can be merged into fewer files. > The kernel style guides atleast to me are primarily about the > readability and understandability of the code. > not where the curly brackets are. > >> I'll send an update once we have the server up and running. >> >> Thanks, >> Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
