On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:12:18PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote: > On 12/03/02 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[le whackety] > >Now, if Red Hat is pushing ext3 as an "enterprise ready solution," they > >should know better than to believe their own marketing material. ;-) > >XFS or JFS (or AFS) are far better and more suitable for The Enterprise > >(c). > > I'm not talking specifically about Redhat. Name one major distro that > didn't ship ext3 as their first journaling FS. Oh yea, SCOdera did push > Reiser early on. I've just had countless problems with ext3, and zero > with XFS. SuSE, too (I see Aaron pointed this out, too). You might push ext3 harder than I do. I have nothing against XFS; it's a superior solution. I'm here at ext3, though, it ain't broken, so I don't feel the need to fix it. [le clippety] K -- I've enjoyed just about as much of this as I can stand. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
