On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 06:42:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > > With the removal of the trace_*_rcuidle() tracepoints, there is no reason > to protect tracepoints with SRCU. The reason the SRCU protection was > added, was because it can protect tracepoints when RCU is not "watching". > Now that tracepoints are only used when RCU is watching, remove the SRCU > protection. It just made things more complex and confusing anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]> > ---
Nice! Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
