On 9/4/24 00:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 08:53:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> This should do. I could get it into the next minor version. > > Sean, is that enough for your use case? Otherwise I'd keep the > unsigned long long for the _sg array, and use the proper types > elsewhere.
Yes, this is fine by me. --Sean
