Since the CSI controller binding is getting a bit more complex due to the addition of MIPI CSI-2 bridge support, make the ports node explicit with the parallel port.
This way, it's clear that the controller only supports parallel interface input and there's no confusion about the port number. Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi index 9be13378d4df..02b698cace6a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi @@ -803,6 +803,15 @@ csi: camera@1cb0000 { pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&csi_pins>; status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + csi_in_parallel: port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + }; }; hdmi: hdmi@1ee0000 { -- 2.29.2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20201128142839.517949-10-paul.kocialkowski%40bootlin.com.
