On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:06:47AM +0000, André Przywara wrote: > > If we still needs it, > > First: we definitely need this symbol, since it guards an implementation > defined register and the Cortex-A53 does not define it. So we have to > confine its use to the ARMv7 Cortex CPUs.
Ack. > > x86 has a CONFIG_SMP symbol, that would be > > better to just leverage that. > > Sounds tempting, but this seems to be a generic symbol that enables SMP > support _within_ U-Boot, so it allows multiple cores to execute U-Boot > code. This is clearly not what we want. Defining it seems to enable > architecture specific and generic code paths in U-Boot. > > I can rename this symbol if that helps to avoid confusion, for instance > to read CONFIG_SUNXI_NO_ACTLR_SMP or to CONFIG_CPU_IS_NOT_SMP or > CONFIG_CPU_IS_UP. There's nothing sunxi specific about it, the last one is better imho. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
