On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 05:57:50PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:12:13AM +0700, André Przywara wrote: > > I see that you merged the sun50i-a64 defconfig patch into -next, which > > is a good thing since the drivers get some compile testing. > > Not sure if you wanted to send this patch also as part of a pull request > > for the next merge window: if you planned so, please don't ;-) > > I sent it to arm-soc last week, it's been pulled, and will go in 4.6. > > > Will always gets a lot of unnecessary conflicts with defconfig, so he > > wants to merge them more or less manually after -rc1 is out. That way we > > know what went in and what should be compiled. > > I can work out the exact needed options during the merge window and can > > send you the list of options or an actual patch to you to ACK it. > > I don't get it. When you sent these patches, I asked if I needed to > merge them and who to send it to. The answer has been "yes" and to > arm-soc. Has that changed?
No. arm-soc is the right place for these, including any defconfig changes. I just typically get CC'd on lots of defconfig stuff, so I batch it all up and see what's left at -rc1. If arm-soc has taken care of it by then, so much the better. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
