On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:59:29AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 26 April 2015 at 17:12, Michal Suchanek <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 26 April 2015 at 16:41, Maxime Ripard > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:17:35PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > >>> On 25 April 2015 at 16:56, Michal Suchanek <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > Hello, > >>> > > >>> > I am running linux 4.0.0-rc4-00221-g201b4e1-dirty on my a10s olinuxino > >> > >> So, just to sum things up, you only have 221 patches, plus some random > >> modifications to your kernel. I totally get what code you're using > >> now. > > Yes, and since I updated to Linus master I have > 4.0.0-11340-g8dd1a3c-dirty which is fewer out-of-tree patches but way > more patches since last release tag.
Could you please test on a pristine tag? I don't really care about whether that tag comes from linus, stable, next, arm-soc, or whatever as long as it's something actually in some maintainer's repo. You still have an awful lot of patches, with some local modifications, that makes it simply impossible for us to help you in any way, since we don't even know what code you're using. > >>> > I tried rebasing on top of linus master in the hope of getting some > >>> > more recent drivers for non-sunxi related devices but I get no emac > >>> > connectivity anymore. > >>> > > >>> > Everything appears OK except there are no frames on the wire that seem > >>> > to originate from the board nor does the board receive any. Leds on > >>> > the ethernet port seem to work as normal. > >>> > > >>> > >>> Fixed by > >>> > >>> commit 7a848b5a9fdcf8fc9e5b8b1045cb9b95098a5319 > >>> Author: Michal Suchanek <[email protected]> > >>> Date: Sun Apr 26 15:53:49 2015 +0200 > >>> > >>> Revert "net: allwinner: emac: Claim our SRAM" > >>> > >>> This reverts commit 418c7a0486eb530033c8b436d729015a1193a84b. > >> > >> And this is another commit I have no idea where it comes from. > > > > That's a good question. Either it's from Linus tree or sunxi-wip. > > And it is no longer present in sunxi-wip so I guess this fixes it. I don't know to what sunxi-wip branch you're referring too, but it won't land in 4.1, which means that we still have some time to find out which potential issues there is. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
