Hi, if someone want to make a binary analysis/reverse engineering of proprietary driver I would donate to the project. Is there some paypal accepting donations to this project? Or some donation box for the linux-sunxi project as well?
Em quinta-feira, 12 de março de 2015 06:25:41 UTC-3, Simos Xenitellis escreveu: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Benjamin Henrion <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Simos Xenitellis > > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Henrion <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tuesday, March 10, 2015, Quink <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >>>> I have communicated with the author of source code of libvdecoder.so. > >>>> The code has been rewrote completely, has no relationship with > FFmpeg, > >>> > >>> I don't think it would resist a binary analysis. > >>> > >> > >> Doesn't pass the code of conduct (for example, > >> http://www.ubuntu.com/about/about-ubuntu/conduct). > > > > I don't see how I am violating any code of conduct here, quite the > contrary. > > > > The issue is that you *insinuate* that the claim (no relationship with > FFmpeg) is false. > What would be the next step to such a discussion? The one side claims > no, the other yes, ad infinitum. > > For this to go forward, you or someone else needs to do this "binary > analysis". > Once the binary analysis is done and you have something to show, you > can reply with your data. In that way, such a discussion could > potentially move forward. > > In terms of "code of conduct" documents, the idea is, when replying, > to move a discussion forward. > If a thread veers off, then change the Subject:, thus start a new thread. > If you find any evidence of common binary code, you can present it > respectfully > and still it is going to be strong evidence (i.e. I did > "arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -d libvdecoder.so" > and the same to that other lib, and function xyz matches as shown here > and here). > > Simos > > > I was maintaining the ISL3893 project 10 years ago, where one of the > > vendor was sued in court in Germany for not giving out the sources: > > > > http://isl3893.sourceforge.net/ > > > > But that was on the action of copyright holders at the time (Harald > Welte). > > > > -- > > Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> > > FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 > > "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software > > patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. > > Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of > > software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent > > court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their > > favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or > > democratically elected legislators." > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "linux-sunxi" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
