On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:40:45PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 
> master
> head:   684a64bf32b6e488004e0ad7f0d7e922798f65b6
> commit: f2519d4d4fc4d36f2b58c5614357de9f5b4032fc ARC: Emulate one-byte cmpxchg
> date:   12 days ago
> config: arc-randconfig-r123-20240925 
> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240925/202409251336.toc0tvwb-...@intel.com/config)
> compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce: 
> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240925/202409251336.toc0tvwb-...@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version 
> of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> | Closes: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409251336.toc0tvwb-...@intel.com/
> 
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:252:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in 
> initializer (different address spaces) @@     expected unsigned long 
> [noderef] __percpu *ipi_data_ptr @@     got unsigned long * @@
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:252:48: sparse:     expected unsigned long [noderef] 
> __percpu *ipi_data_ptr
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:252:48: sparse:     got unsigned long *
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:267:18: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> (different address spaces) @@     expected void const volatile *v @@     got 
> unsigned long [noderef] __percpu *__ai_ptr @@
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:267:18: sparse:     expected void const volatile *v
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:267:18: sparse:     got unsigned long [noderef] 
> __percpu *__ai_ptr
> >> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:267:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space 
> >> '__percpu' of expression
> >> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:267:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space 
> >> '__percpu' of expression

I could "fix" this using __force.  Is that a reasonable approach?

If I don't hear otherwise, I will take that approach.

                                                        Thanx, Paul

>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:401:72: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 
> (different address spaces) @@     expected void [noderef] __percpu 
> *percpu_dev_id @@     got int *dev @@
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:401:72: sparse:     expected void [noderef] __percpu 
> *percpu_dev_id
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:401:72: sparse:     got int *dev
>    arch/arc/kernel/smp.c:265:30: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef 
> expression
> 
> vim +/__percpu +267 arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> 
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  249  
> ddf84433f411b6 Vineet Gupta    2013-11-25  250  static void 
> ipi_send_msg_one(int cpu, enum ipi_msg_type msg)
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  251  {
> f2a4aa5646687f Vineet Gupta    2013-11-26  252        unsigned long __percpu 
> *ipi_data_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&ipi_data, cpu);
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  253        unsigned long old, new;
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  254        unsigned long flags;
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  255  
> f2a4aa5646687f Vineet Gupta    2013-11-26  256        pr_debug("%d Sending 
> msg [%d] to %d\n", smp_processor_id(), msg, cpu);
> f2a4aa5646687f Vineet Gupta    2013-11-26  257  
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  258        local_irq_save(flags);
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  259  
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  260        /*
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  261         * Atomically write new 
> msg bit (in case others are writing too),
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  262         * and read back old 
> value
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  263         */
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  264        do {
> c6ed4d84a2c49d Bang Li         2022-03-19  265                new = old = 
> *ipi_data_ptr;
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  266                new |= 1U << 
> msg;
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28 @267        } while 
> (cmpxchg(ipi_data_ptr, old, new) != old);
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  268  
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  269        /*
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  270         * Call the platform 
> specific IPI kick function, but avoid if possible:
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  271         * Only do so if 
> there's no pending msg from other concurrent sender(s).
> 82a423053eb3cf Changcheng Deng 2021-08-14  272         * Otherwise, receiver 
> will see this msg as well when it takes the
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  273         * IPI corresponding to 
> that msg. This is true, even if it is already in
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  274         * IPI handler, because 
> !@old means it has not yet dequeued the msg(s)
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  275         * so @new msg can be a 
> free-loader
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  276         */
> d8e8c7dda11f5d Vineet Gupta    2013-11-28  277        if 
> (plat_smp_ops.ipi_send && !old)
> ddf84433f411b6 Vineet Gupta    2013-11-25  278                
> plat_smp_ops.ipi_send(cpu);
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  279  
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  280        
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  281  }
> 41195d236e8445 Vineet Gupta    2013-01-18  282  
> 
> :::::: The code at line 267 was first introduced by commit
> :::::: d8e8c7dda11f5d5cf90495f2e89d917a83509bc0 ARC: [SMP] optimize IPI send 
> and receive
> 
> :::::: TO: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
> :::::: CC: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
> 
> -- 
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to