tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master head: f529a6d274b3b8c75899e949649d231298f30a32 commit: 99ce03b849f89ae2a00addf5b5475d2bb81972f6 [5871/7322] ARC: Emulate one-byte cmpxchg config: arc-randconfig-r132-20240423 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240423/202404230701.nzcvdrfu-...@intel.com/config) compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240423/202404230701.nzcvdrfu-...@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404230701.nzcvdrfu-...@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long [usertype] old @@ got struct optimistic_spin_node *_o_ @@ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: expected unsigned long [usertype] old kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: got struct optimistic_spin_node *_o_ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long [usertype] new @@ got struct optimistic_spin_node *_n_ @@ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: expected unsigned long [usertype] new kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: got struct optimistic_spin_node *_n_ >> kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in >> assignment (different base types) @@ expected struct >> optimistic_spin_node *_prev_ @@ got unsigned long @@ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: expected struct optimistic_spin_node *_prev_ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: got unsigned long kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long [usertype] old @@ got struct optimistic_spin_node *_o_ @@ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: expected unsigned long [usertype] old kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: got struct optimistic_spin_node *_o_ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long [usertype] new @@ got struct optimistic_spin_node *_n_ @@ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: expected unsigned long [usertype] new kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: got struct optimistic_spin_node *_n_ >> kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in >> assignment (different base types) @@ expected struct >> optimistic_spin_node *_prev_ @@ got unsigned long @@ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: expected struct optimistic_spin_node *_prev_ kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:165:21: sparse: got unsigned long vim +165 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 92 90631822c5d307 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 93 bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 94 { 046a619d8e9746 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 95 struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); 046a619d8e9746 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 96 struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next; 90631822c5d307 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 97 int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id()); 90631822c5d307 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 98 int old; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 99 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 100 node->locked = 0; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 101 node->next = NULL; 90631822c5d307 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 102 node->cpu = curr; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 103 c55a6ffa6285e2 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Davidlohr Bueso 2015-09-14 104 /* b4b29f94856ad6 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Will Deacon 2015-12-11 105 * We need both ACQUIRE (pairs with corresponding RELEASE in b4b29f94856ad6 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Will Deacon 2015-12-11 106 * unlock() uncontended, or fastpath) and RELEASE (to publish b4b29f94856ad6 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Will Deacon 2015-12-11 107 * the node fields we just initialised) semantics when updating b4b29f94856ad6 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Will Deacon 2015-12-11 108 * the lock tail. c55a6ffa6285e2 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Davidlohr Bueso 2015-09-14 109 */ b4b29f94856ad6 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Will Deacon 2015-12-11 110 old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr); 90631822c5d307 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 111 if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 112 return true; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 113 90631822c5d307 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 114 prev = decode_cpu(old); 90631822c5d307 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Jason Low 2014-07-14 115 node->prev = prev; 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 116 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 117 /* 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 118 * osq_lock() unqueue 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 119 * 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 120 * node->prev = prev osq_wait_next() 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 121 * WMB MB 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 122 * prev->next = node next->prev = prev // unqueue-C 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 123 * 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 124 * Here 'node->prev' and 'next->prev' are the same variable and we need 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 125 * to ensure these stores happen in-order to avoid corrupting the list. 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 126 */ 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 127 smp_wmb(); 50972fe78f24f1 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Prateek Sood 2017-07-14 128 4d3199e4ca8e66 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Davidlohr Bueso 2015-02-22 129 WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node); fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 130 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 131 /* fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 132 * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 133 * moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack. fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 134 * fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 135 * However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 136 * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 137 * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing. fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 138 */ fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 139 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 140 /* e2db7592be8e83 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Ingo Molnar 2021-03-22 141 * Wait to acquire the lock or cancellation. Note that need_resched() f5bfdc8e3947a7 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Waiman Long 2020-01-13 142 * will come with an IPI, which will wake smp_cond_load_relaxed() if it f5bfdc8e3947a7 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Waiman Long 2020-01-13 143 * is implemented with a monitor-wait. vcpu_is_preempted() relies on f5bfdc8e3947a7 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Waiman Long 2020-01-13 144 * polling, be careful. fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 145 */ f5bfdc8e3947a7 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Waiman Long 2020-01-13 146 if (smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->locked, VAL || need_resched() || f5bfdc8e3947a7 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Waiman Long 2020-01-13 147 vcpu_is_preempted(node_cpu(node->prev)))) fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 148 return true; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 149 f5bfdc8e3947a7 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Waiman Long 2020-01-13 150 /* unqueue */ fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 151 /* fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 152 * Step - A -- stabilize @prev fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 153 * fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 154 * Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 155 * unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 156 * (or later). fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 157 */ fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 158 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 159 for (;;) { 33190b675ce2ea kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Qian Cai 2020-02-11 160 /* 33190b675ce2ea kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Qian Cai 2020-02-11 161 * cpu_relax() below implies a compiler barrier which would 33190b675ce2ea kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Qian Cai 2020-02-11 162 * prevent this comparison being optimized away. 33190b675ce2ea kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Qian Cai 2020-02-11 163 */ 33190b675ce2ea kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Qian Cai 2020-02-11 164 if (data_race(prev->next) == node && fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 @165 cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node) fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 166 break; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 167 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 168 /* fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 169 * We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(), e2db7592be8e83 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Ingo Molnar 2021-03-22 170 * in which case we should observe @node->locked becoming fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 171 * true. fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 172 */ fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 173 if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 174 return true; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 175 f2f09a4cee3507 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Christian Borntraeger 2016-10-25 176 cpu_relax(); fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 177 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 178 /* fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 179 * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 180 * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer. fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 181 */ 4d3199e4ca8e66 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Davidlohr Bueso 2015-02-22 182 prev = READ_ONCE(node->prev); fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 183 } fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 184 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 185 /* fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 186 * Step - B -- stabilize @next fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 187 * fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 188 * Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 189 * back to @prev. fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 190 */ fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 191 563adbfc351b2a kernel/locking/osq_lock.c David Laight 2023-12-29 192 next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev->cpu); fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 193 if (!next) fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 194 return false; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 195 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 196 /* fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 197 * Step - C -- unlink fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 198 * fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 199 * @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 200 * pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 201 * it will wait in Step-A. fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 202 */ fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 203 4d3199e4ca8e66 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Davidlohr Bueso 2015-02-22 204 WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, prev); 4d3199e4ca8e66 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c Davidlohr Bueso 2015-02-22 205 WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next); fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 206 fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 207 return false; fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 208 } fb0527bd5ea99b kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c Peter Zijlstra 2014-01-29 209 :::::: The code at line 165 was first introduced by commit :::::: fb0527bd5ea99bfeb2dd91e3c1433ecf745d6b99 locking/mutexes: Introduce cancelable MCS lock for adaptive spinning :::::: TO: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> :::::: CC: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
