On 5/26/2022 5:42 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi,

On 5/25/22 07:48, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
As per asm-generic definition and other architectures __fls should
return unsigned long.

No functional change is expected as return value should fit in unsigned
long.

Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński<amadeuszx.slawin...@linux.intel.com>

Applied to for-curr.

Thx,
-Vineet

And apparently __fls is defined in two places in ARC header and I only changed one, should I send incremental patch on top of already merged one or v2?

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to