On 2020-08-24 18:21:21 [+0000], Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >>>> {standard input}:5973: Error: operand out of range (512 is not between
> >>>> -512 and 511)
> >>
>
> The error above was fixed back in April:
> 799587d5731db9dc ("ARC: [plat-eznps]: Restrict to CONFIG_ISA_ARCOMPACT")
This commit is
|git describe --contains 799587d5731db9dc
|v5.7-rc7~32^2~2
and CI said:
|head: d012a7190fc1fd72ed48911e77ca97ba4521bccd
^^ v5.9-rc2
|commit: de8f5e4f2dc1f032b46afda0a78cab5456974f89 lockdep: Introduce wait-type
checks
^^ v5.7-rc1
so my assumption was that it tested rc2 and bisected it down to that
commit. Otherwise I don't see the point in testing such an old commit on
a recent -rc2 and complaining about things not related to one another.
> > I have here gcc 10 and the output is:
>
> I suppose this is mainline gcc 10 ? Although it doesn't seem like compiler
> version
> related.
Sorry for that. It is
|$ ~/cross-gcc/gcc-10.1.0-nolibc/arc-linux/bin/arc-linux-gcc -v
|Using built-in specs.
|COLLECT_GCC=/home/bigeasy/cross-gcc/gcc-10.1.0-nolibc/arc-linux/bin/arc-linux-gcc
|COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/bigeasy/cross-gcc/gcc-10.1.0-nolibc/arc-linux/bin/../libexec/gcc/arc-linux/10.1.0/lto-wrapper
|Target: arc-linux
|Configured with: /home/arnd/git/gcc/configure --target=arc-linux
--enable-targets=all
--prefix=/home/arnd/cross/x86_64/gcc-10.1.0-nolibc/arc-linux
--enable-languages=c --without-headers --disable-bootstrap --disable-nls
--disable-threads --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp
--disable-libgomp --disable-decimal-float --disable-libquadmath
--disable-libatomic --disable-libcc1 --disable-libmpx --enable-checking=release
|Thread model: single
|Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
|gcc version 10.1.0 (GCC)
This is the one built by Arnd and hosted at
https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
Is it suitable for testing?
> > and the assembler does not like that.
> > After the removal CONFIG_ARC_PLAT_EZNPS I got to stage 2:
> > |drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c:80:16: error: 'CTOP_AUX_IACK' undeclared
> > (first use in this function)
> > | 80 | write_aux_reg(CTOP_AUX_IACK, 1 << irq);
> >
>
> Indeed this is a problem I can reproduce. Enabling CONFIG_EZNPS_GIC on a non
> ARC700 build causes the issue: the ctop header is inside platform code
> (arch/arc/plat-eznps/include/plat/ctop.h) which obviously fails if not
> building
> for ARC.
>
> My solution is to move ctop.h to include/soc/nps/plat/.
You know probably best :)
> > so I removed CONFIG_EZNPS_GIC. And then I ended with:
> > | LD vmlinux.o
> > |arc-linux-ld:
> > gcc-10.1.0-nolibc/arc-linux/bin/../lib/gcc/arc-linux/10.1.0/arc700/libgcc.a(_muldi3.o):
> > compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian
> > |arc-linux-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file
> > gcc-10.1.0-nolibc/arc-linux/bin/../lib/gcc/arc-linux/10.1.0/arc700/libgcc.a(_muldi3.o)
>
> This is unrelated since original .config with CONFIG_ARC_PLAT_EZNPS would have
> selected Big endina build, but you need a BE toolchain to get that working
> (since
> libgcc emulation code still comes from toolchain).
Is a switch missing while building the gcc, another gcc target needed or
is this something that is not part of upstream gcc?
> >
> > Please update CI and ARC.
>
> Nothing to update in CI. I'll send the ARC patch as a follow up.
but it shouldn't complain about a commit merged in v5.7-rc1 because it
caused an error which was then fixed in v5.7-rc7 while using HEAD
v5.9-rc2?
> Thx for reporting.
You are welcome.
> -Vineet
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
