On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 03:33:06PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:59:55AM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
> >
> > Every single architecture (including !CONFIG_HIGHMEM) calls...
> >
> > pagefault_enable();
> > preempt_enable();
> >
> > ... before returning from __kunmap_atomic(). Lift this code into the
> > kunmap_atomic() macro.
> >
> > While we are at it rename __kunmap_atomic() to kunmap_atomic_high() to
> > be consistent.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
>
> This patch results in:
>
> Starting init: /bin/sh exists but couldn't execute it (error -14)
>
> when trying to boot microblazeel:petalogix-ml605 in qemu.
Thanks for the report. I'm not readily seeing the issue.
Do you have a kernel config? Specifically is CONFIG_HIGHMEM set?
>
> Bisect log attached.
>
> Guenter
>
> ---
> # bad: [bdecf38f228bcca73b31ada98b5b7ba1215eb9c9] Add linux-next specific
> files for 20200515
> # good: [2ef96a5bb12be62ef75b5828c0aab838ebb29cb8] Linux 5.7-rc5
> git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v5.7-rc5'
> # good: [3674d7aa7a8e61d993886c2fb7c896c5ef85e988] Merge remote-tracking
> branch 'crypto/master'
> git bisect good 3674d7aa7a8e61d993886c2fb7c896c5ef85e988
> # good: [87f6f21783522e6d62127cf33ae5e95f50874beb] Merge remote-tracking
> branch 'spi/for-next'
> git bisect good 87f6f21783522e6d62127cf33ae5e95f50874beb
> # good: [5c428e8277d5d97c85126387d4e00aa5adde4400] Merge remote-tracking
> branch 'staging/staging-next'
> git bisect good 5c428e8277d5d97c85126387d4e00aa5adde4400
> # good: [f68de67ed934e7bdef4799fd7777c86f33f14982] Merge remote-tracking
> branch 'hyperv/hyperv-next'
> git bisect good f68de67ed934e7bdef4799fd7777c86f33f14982
> # bad: [54acd2dc52b069da59639eea0d0c92726f32fb01] mm/memblock: fix a typo in
> comment "implict"->"implicit"
> git bisect bad 54acd2dc52b069da59639eea0d0c92726f32fb01
> # good: [784a17aa58a529b84f7cc50f351ed4acf3bd11f3] mm: remove the pgprot
> argument to __vmalloc
> git bisect good 784a17aa58a529b84f7cc50f351ed4acf3bd11f3
> # good: [6cd8137ff37e9a37aee2d2a8889c8beb8eab192f] khugepaged: replace the
> usage of system(3) in the test
> git bisect good 6cd8137ff37e9a37aee2d2a8889c8beb8eab192f
> # bad: [6987da379826ed01b8a1cf046b67cc8cc10117cc] sparc: remove unnecessary
> includes
> git bisect bad 6987da379826ed01b8a1cf046b67cc8cc10117cc
> # good: [bc17b545388f64c09e83e367898e28f60277c584] mm/hugetlb: define a
> generic fallback for is_hugepage_only_range()
> git bisect good bc17b545388f64c09e83e367898e28f60277c584
> # bad: [9b5aa5b43f957f03a1f4a9aff5f7924e2ebbc011]
> arch-kmap_atomic-consolidate-duplicate-code-checkpatch-fixes
> git bisect bad 9b5aa5b43f957f03a1f4a9aff5f7924e2ebbc011
> # good: [0941a38ff0790c1004270f952067a5918a4ba32d] arch/kmap: remove
> redundant arch specific kmaps
> git bisect good 0941a38ff0790c1004270f952067a5918a4ba32d
> # good: [56e635a64c2cbfa815c851af10e0f811e809977b]
> arch-kunmap-remove-duplicate-kunmap-implementations-fix
> git bisect good 56e635a64c2cbfa815c851af10e0f811e809977b
> # bad: [60f96b2233c790d4f1c49317643051f1670bcb29] arch/kmap_atomic:
> consolidate duplicate code
> git bisect bad 60f96b2233c790d4f1c49317643051f1670bcb29
> # good: [7b3708dc3bf72a647243064fe7ddf9a76248ddfd]
> {x86,powerpc,microblaze}/kmap: move preempt disable
> git bisect good 7b3708dc3bf72a647243064fe7ddf9a76248ddfd
> # first bad commit: [60f96b2233c790d4f1c49317643051f1670bcb29]
> arch/kmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate code
I'm confused by this. This points to an earlier commit being bad?
commit 60f96b2233c790d4f1c49317643051f1670bcb29
Author: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
Date: Thu May 14 13:39:54 2020 +1000
arch/kmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate code
Every arch has the same code to ensure atomic operations and a check for
!HIGHMEM page.
Remove the duplicate code by defining a core kmap_atomic() which only
calls the arch specific kmap_atomic_high() when the page is high memory.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200507150004.1423069-7-ira.we...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Cc: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <ch...@zankel.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbog...@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
Any idea which one it is?
Ira
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
