01.04.2019, 21:02, "Vineet Gupta" <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com>: > On 4/1/19 7:46 AM, David Laight wrote: >> From: gre...@linuxfoundation.org >>> Sent: 31 March 2019 11:54 >> ... >>> Yes, "int" is a very nice variable for "size", you need to explain why >>> it is better to use size_t here please. >> Actually, on x86_64 you probably want 'unsigned int' to avoid the >> compiler having to generate a sign-extending register move if the >> value is ever used in a 64bit expression (eg an address calculation). > > Thats likely true for non x86 arches too (for certain on ARC). That is also > the > reason I dislike "bool", despite its "software engineering" benefits. Per ARC > ABI > (and likely others too) it is signed 8 bits and any use thereof, requires the > compiler to generate an additional EXTB instruction to promote to 32-bit int > with > sign extension before using the value. > > -Vineet
George Spelvin wrote "So how about *deleting* the parameter instead? That simplifies everything.", and he is right, so I am just going to completely remove it. Any objections? -- With Best Regards, Andrey Abramov _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
