On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Vineet Gupta wrote: > is due to linkage of a generic libgcc routine fp-bit.c
I'd suggest moving from fp-bit to soft-fp in libgcc (soft-fp is a lot faster, see the 2006 GCC Summit proceedings, though of course you may wish to do your own benchmarking on ARC), which would probably avoid that issue (though if very concerned about about code size, soft-fp is a bit larger). But the "?" in localplt.data would still make sense as long as the GCC versions using fp-bit there are supported for building the ARC glibc port. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
