On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 03:23:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Yes, that would be worth trying. However, I also just noticed that the > fetch-ops (which are now used to implement test_and_set_bit_lock()) seem > to be missing the backwards branch in the LL/SC case. Yet another diff > below. > > Will > > --->8 > > diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > index 4e0072730241..f06c5ed672b3 100644 > --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v) > \ > "1: llock %[orig], [%[ctr]] \n" \ > " " #asm_op " %[val], %[orig], %[i] \n" \ > " scond %[val], [%[ctr]] \n" \ > - " \n" \ > + " bnz 1b \n" \ > : [val] "=&r" (val), \ > [orig] "=&r" (orig) \ > : [ctr] "r" (&v->counter), \
ACK!! sorry about that, no idea how I messed that up. Also, once it all works, they should look at switching to _relaxed atomics for LL/SC. _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
