On 07/24/2018 03:04 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 07/24/2018 01:46 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> >> >> Fix build errors in arch/arc/'s delay.h: >> - add <linux/delay.h> for loops_per_jiffy >> - add <asm-generic/types.h> for "u64" >> >> In file included from ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/cxio_hal.c:32: >> ../arch/arc/include/asm/delay.h: In function '__udelay': >> ../arch/arc/include/asm/delay.h:61:12: error: 'u64' undeclared (first use in >> this function) >> loops = ((u64) usecs * 4295 * HZ * loops_per_jiffy) >> 32; >> ^~~ >> >> In file included from ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/cxio_hal.c:32: >> ../arch/arc/include/asm/delay.h: In function '__udelay': >> ../arch/arc/include/asm/delay.h:63:37: error: 'loops_per_jiffy' undeclared >> (first use in this function) >> loops = ((u64) usecs * 4295 * HZ * loops_per_jiffy) >> 32; >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> >> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com> >> Cc: Ofer Levi <ofe...@mellanox.com> >> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org >> --- >> arch/arc/include/asm/delay.h | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> --- linux-next-20180723.orig/arch/arc/include/asm/delay.h >> +++ linux-next-20180723/arch/arc/include/asm/delay.h >> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ >> #ifndef __ASM_ARC_UDELAY_H >> #define __ASM_ARC_UDELAY_H >> >> +#include <linux/delay.h> > > this file in turn includes asm/delay.h - the header guards will catch nested > inclusion still seems ugly. Should we just reference loops_per_jiffy here like > other arches do in theur delay.h
Yes, that's a good idea. I'll do that. >> +#include <asm-generic/types.h> >> #include <asm/param.h> /* HZ */ >> >> static inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) >> > -- ~Randy _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
