On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:01 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:10 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Overall, since we are going to expose some properties to the Device > > Tree > > I would really think twice about naming. Better if we reuse > > something > > existing already. > > > > So, what I can see is > > > > dmacap,private > > dmacap,memcpy > > > > Here is a selling point as well, i.e. standardization. > > > > As I can see these property name used only in "mv_xor" driver. And > they are marked as deprecated. > So, I'm not sure if I should used these names.
Oh, good catch! So, then I leave this to DT experienced guys to decide. Rob? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
