A bugfix introduced a harmless gcc warning in nfs4_slot_seqid_in_use
if we enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized again:
fs/nfs/nfs4session.c:203:54: error: 'cur_seq' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
gcc is not smart enough to conclude that the IS_ERR/PTR_ERR pair
results in a nonzero return value here. Using PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO()
instead makes this clear to the compiler.
Fixes: e09c978aae5b ("NFSv4.1: Fix Oopsable condition in server callback races")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
First submitted on Aug 31, but ended up not getting applied then
as the warning was disabled in v4.8-rc
Anna Schumaker said at the kernel summit that she had applied
it and would send it for 4.9, but as of 2016-11-09 it has not
made it into linux-next.
fs/nfs/nfs4session.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4session.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4session.c
index b629730..150c5a1 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4session.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4session.c
@@ -178,12 +178,14 @@ static int nfs4_slot_get_seqid(struct nfs4_slot_table
*tbl, u32 slotid,
__must_hold(&tbl->slot_tbl_lock)
{
struct nfs4_slot *slot;
+ int ret;
slot = nfs4_lookup_slot(tbl, slotid);
- if (IS_ERR(slot))
- return PTR_ERR(slot);
- *seq_nr = slot->seq_nr;
- return 0;
+ ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(slot);
+ if (!ret)
+ *seq_nr = slot->seq_nr;
+
+ return ret;
}
/*
--
2.9.0
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
