On 11/06/2016 11:34 PM, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Noam Camus <noa...@mellanox.com>
>
> Generic IRQ mechanism is already acknowledge the IPI IRQ.
> Doing this once more time in IPI handler is not needed.

Changelog can be improved !
Generic IRQ mechanism can't ack the irq. The NPQ irqchip driver does this for 
all
irqs already - so no special handling is needed for IPI in NPS case.

-Vineet
>
> Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noa...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  arch/arc/plat-eznps/smp.c |    6 ------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/plat-eznps/smp.c b/arch/arc/plat-eznps/smp.c
> index 5e901f8..56a4c85 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/plat-eznps/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/plat-eznps/smp.c
> @@ -140,16 +140,10 @@ static void eznps_init_per_cpu(int cpu)
>       mtm_enable_core(cpu);
>  }
>  
> -static void eznps_ipi_clear(int irq)
> -{
> -     write_aux_reg(CTOP_AUX_IACK, 1 << irq);
> -}
> -
>  struct plat_smp_ops plat_smp_ops = {
>       .info           = smp_cpuinfo_buf,
>       .init_early_smp = eznps_init_cpumasks,
>       .cpu_kick       = eznps_smp_wakeup_cpu,
>       .ipi_send       = eznps_ipi_send,
>       .init_per_cpu   = eznps_init_per_cpu,
> -     .ipi_clear      = eznps_ipi_clear,
>  };


_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to