On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:23:09PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 11/03/2016 02:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:32PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> The current code doesn't even compile .... > > > > Give a better description in the log, especially if this patch is supposed > > to > > go to stable@ > > OK.
[ ... ] > > Is the condition correct ? If I refer to your previous answer, the bit will > > be > > set for status if the counter wrapped up. So in this case, we won't exit the > > loop until we wrap up, no ? > > No thats not what I meant. Bit being set there means things are fine (no > interrupt > taken, no increment of high after low was readetc). All I changed here was > use of > 0x8000_0000 to the macro. BBIT0 in assembler means branch if bit was clear. Fair enough. So the logic is inverted 'status' == 0 means 'not fine'. _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
