On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Here is another version of the patch queue to make gfs2 and similar file >> systems work with SELinux. As suggested by Stephen Smalley [*], the relevant >> uses of inode->security are wrapped in function calls that try to revalidate >> invalid labels. >> >> [*] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144416710207686&w=2 >> >> The patches are looking good from my point of view; is there anything else >> that >> needs addressing? > > Hi Andreas, > > I'm largely staying out of the way on this patchset as Stephen has > been providing good review and feedback (I see he identified a few > more things in this latest revision),
Yes, Stephen is being very helpful. > however, before I accept this > upstream I'd like to see an ACK from one of the GFS developers on the > last patch which touches the code under fs/gfs2. Sure, no worries there ... Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
