On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Andrea Vai wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 19/09/2019 alle 14.14 +0000, Damien Le Moal ha scritto:
> > On 2019/09/19 16:01, Alan Stern wrote:
> > [...]
> > > No doubt Andrea will be happy to test your fix when it's ready.
>
> Yes, of course.
>
> >
> > Hannes posted an RFC series:
> >
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg133848.html
> >
> > Andrea can try it.
>
> Ok, but I would need some instructions please, because I am not able
> to understand how to "try it". Sorry for that.
I have attached the two patches to this email. You should start with a
recent kernel source tree and apply the patches by doing:
git apply patch1 patch2
or something similar. Then build a kernel from the new source code and
test it.
Ultimately, if nobody can find a way to restore the sequential I/O
behavior we had prior to commit f664a3cc17b7, that commit may have to
be reverted.
Alan Stern
From: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
When blk_mq_request_issue_directly() returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE we
need to requeue the I/O, but adding it to the global request list
will mess up with the passed-in request list. So re-add the request
to the original list and leave it to the caller to handle situations
where the list wasn't completely emptied.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index b038ec680e84..44ff3c1442a4 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1899,8 +1899,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx,
if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) {
if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE ||
ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
- blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq,
- list_empty(list));
+ list_add(list, &rq->queuelist);
break;
}
blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
--
2.16.4
From: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
A scheduler might be attached even for devices exposing more than
one hardware queue, so the check for the number of hardware queue
is pointless and should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 44ff3c1442a4..faab542e4836 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1931,7 +1931,6 @@ static void blk_add_rq_to_plug(struct blk_plug *plug,
struct request *rq)
static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
{
- const int is_sync = op_is_sync(bio->bi_opf);
const int is_flush_fua = op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf);
struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = { .flags = 0};
struct request *rq;
@@ -1977,7 +1976,7 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue
*q, struct bio *bio)
/* bypass scheduler for flush rq */
blk_insert_flush(rq);
blk_mq_run_hw_queue(data.hctx, true);
- } else if (plug && (q->nr_hw_queues == 1 || q->mq_ops->commit_rqs)) {
+ } else if (plug && q->mq_ops->commit_rqs) {
/*
* Use plugging if we have a ->commit_rqs() hook as well, as
* we know the driver uses bd->last in a smart fashion.
@@ -2020,9 +2019,6 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue
*q, struct bio *bio)
blk_mq_try_issue_directly(data.hctx, same_queue_rq,
&cookie);
}
- } else if ((q->nr_hw_queues > 1 && is_sync) || (!q->elevator &&
- !data.hctx->dispatch_busy)) {
- blk_mq_try_issue_directly(data.hctx, rq, &cookie);
} else {
blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, true, true);
}
--
2.16.4
