Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> 
> I'm preparing to move to 2.4, and I use raid5. What's the most
> efficient chunk size? Neil's graphics show that 128k or 256k are
> necessary, even with his patches, to get high performance out of 2.4.
> Is this still true? He's made several changes after the measurements
> posted on the web.

It depends at least partly on your disk subsystem.  You should set aside
a day to test your particular configuration repeatedly, changing one
variable at a time.  I don't think there's a single correct answer.
-- 
= Warren -- ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to