Hi Ulf,
[...]
>
> One of my comments for v2, was that I think you should remove all code which
> was related to HPI to interrupt sleep notification from the runtime PM resume
> path. Instead I wanted you to add that functionality as separate patch based
> on
> top of this patch.
>
> You haven't done that in v3, why?
The sleep_notify call was moved to suspend() per your recommendation.
As far as I understand, no new requests should be sent during mmc_suspend()
process,
thus HPI support is not needed anymore.
Is this the correct assumption?
The only case where HPI is used in this patch - is during sleep_notify timeout
error.
Thanks,
Alex
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{��g"��^n�r���z���h�����&�� �G���h�(�階�ݢj"���m������z�ޖ���f���h���~�m�
