On 5 March 2015 at 09:36, Vinod Koul <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:33:10AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 5 March 2015 at 08:11, Kuninori Morimoto >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Ulf >> > >> >> > Hi Ulf, Vinod, Simon >> >> > >> >> > DMAEngine cleanup patches are accepted in v4.0-rc1 >> >> > >> >> > As I mentioned in >> >> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/42669 >> >> > these are last of sh_mobile_sdhi DMA patches. >> >> > >> >> > These patches uses tmio_mmc_data on platform, >> >> > and remove sh_mobile_sdhi >> >> > >> >> > These are based on >> >> > - linus's v4.0-rc1 >> >> > - Vinod's dma/next (git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git >> >> > :: next) >> >> > >> >> > Vinod >> >> > >> >> > please let us know if it has stable tag or branch > No my next is not stable, I will rebase that. > I think you want to pick topic/sh, that is an immutable branch > Can you check that has all the patches you need for this? > >> >> Please use topic/sh. I will not rebase that, my next would be rebased >> >> frequently... >> > >> > Please let me know if you want me to re-send these patches >> >> I have no issues with the patches as such. Though, I wonder about the >> dependency here. >> >> Does these patches depend on an immutable branch hosted from Vinod's tree? >> >> >> Do you want me to take the patches through my mmc tree or just request >> an ack so Vinod can carry this? > Either ways is okay with me..
I just provided my ack for both patches, so please go ahead and take them through your tree. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
